Todd Carnes Free Essays

1. Talk about how the corporate culture at Ben Jerry’s, as portrayed for this situation, impacts the every day usage of moral choices in the firm. The organization accepts that the â€Å"product, monetary, and social† parts of its statement of purpose are similarly significant, that common regard from everybody in the networks where they are a piece of are essential for a socially capable (and moral) presence. We will compose a custom article test on Todd Carnes or then again any comparative subject just for you Request Now This vision lays the basis where the organization works. They uphold a fairly fun and strange culture, from the manner in which they name their managerial situations, to their item marking. They likewise feel emphatically about supporting the communityâ€when they offered their underlying stock to the general population, it was just at first limited to Vermont occupants. The idea of â€Å"caring capitalism† is as a rule deliberately followed so that the organization works not for the sole motivation behind benefit. Since its beginning, Ben Jerry’s worked with the improvement of the lives of its representatives and the network in mindâ€from making good cause ventures, providing for natural causes, and actualizing smoothed out worker compensationsâ€Ben Jerry’s attempts to adhere to its fundamental beliefs and consistently gives something back to the network. 2. [†¦] In what different ways could Ben Jerry’s show to partners its pledge to moral and socially mindful direct? In Ben Jerry’s Social Audit, its social missions and natural achievements are obviously laid out. Notwithstanding, there were worries that worker spirit is low, generally as a result of the presumption that the organization, especially the top administration, doesn't/would not stay focused on its qualities. Since workers are in the center of the organization’s strategic qualities (and are hence significant partners in the organization), Ben Jerry’s ought not take this issue lightlyâ€they ought to make more activities and chances to insist their duty to the network. 3. [†¦] How can such organizations secure their basic beliefs as they develop from little firms into huge ones and additionally are procured by global aggregates? Organizations like Ben Jerry’s, which begin little however are at last gained by combinations, (for example, Unilever) can ensure their moral and social stages first by a legitimately restricting pre-procurement consent such that the constituents of the first organizations top administration is safeguarded, and that whoever are the begetters of the company’s moral and socially mindful worldview stay in charge and in this manner can protect the ethical establishments of the organization. Upon obtaining, said the executives ought not permit the security cushion of the new umbrella organization to make them smug about maintaining their unique objectives. The organization should keep up open and interior attention to the company’s moral and social duties. Open mindfulness, specifically, will be a positive main thrust for the company’s objectives. Step by step instructions to refer to Todd Carnes, Papers

American Welfare System

American government assistance framework is an oversight plan that offers reserves, human services, food, cover, and different things that residents need in order to remain alive. Individuals who can get help from these government assistance programs are kids, older folks, the handicapped, and other people who are not skilled to support their nuclear family on their contemporary income. The government assistance arrangement of America has set off from a good natured program planned to support occupants who are unable to work and manage the cost of for their kids, to a program that has develop to be productive to annulling the nonstop reliance of the beneficiaries.The American prosperity structure will: ? help more government assistance beneficiaries achieve self-rule through work ? take care of youngsters and sustain families ? permit states to ask about new and unique answers for help government assistance beneficiaries get freedom Collapse of the System It must be comprehend that t he American government assistance framework, as we observe it, should be constant over an all-inclusive timeframe; however unfortunately this framework was incapable to do as such. American government assistance framework was neglected to accomplish its destinations and in giving mitigate to common people.Yet the individuals who are â€Å"pro-welfare† are displeased with the component in disengagement. A few issues that contribute their part in the breakdown of the U. S. government assistance framework: Administrative Overheads: The authoritative costs of all the distinctive government assistance programs are absolutely taking off. It is exorbitant to evaluate cases, oversee common administrations, dispense benefits, watch beneficiaries, charge misrepresentation, sue differences, and inspect execution. Deficient Coverage: Numerous individuals who are qualified for benefits neglect to get them since they either don't have any significant bearing or are amazingly rejected.Even now more individuals are truly denied, however don't reasonable on the grounds that they don't fall into an apt class. Multifaceted nature: The administration of government assistance is tangled. There are a considerable number of activities. The key projects veer by state; nearby freedom changes by region. There are precisely a large number of exceptional government assistance programs in the United States, covering the land like a frayed collection spread. The specialized guidelines of the critical projects are demoralizing. AFDC is multifaceted to the point that authorities go to audit sheets to decide donations.The parameters are too complicated to even think about comprehending (Bernstein and Greenberg, pp. 11-13). In spite of the previously mentioned predicaments, there are further issues which were establishments for the breakdowns of the American government assistance framework are: ? Incapable to keep individuals past the neediness line ? Inconsistency state guideline ? Ina ccessibility of occupations for government assistance beneficiaries in the private zone ? Beneficiaries have necessities that extend past pay maintaining ? Too little points of interest Proposals for Improving the SystemIt is the ideal opportunity for government assistance framework to actualize strategies that will build quick and perceptible turn of events. Projects ought to be defined to adapt to individuals cut off or on prosperity. The difficulty of an extraordinary number of brood being naturally introduced to neediness must be consolidated to decrease the quantity of individuals requiring government assistance. States weak to find employments for government assistance beneficiaries in the private district must be constrained to create network administration occupations and so forth to help the unwaged (Bernstein and Greenberg, p. 14).The American government assistance framework will show signs of improvement in the event that it executes the accompanying proposition: Create a ll inclusive access to human services, build up a widespread maternal and kid wellbeing program, update the conditions for qualification, make arrangements for sub-populaces, expand financial proficiency bolster the family, bolster the general public, give more noteworthy social other option and mitigate more prominent inaction protection. Work Cited Bernstein, J. furthermore, Greenberg, M. (2001), Reforming Welfare Reform, American Prospect, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 11-14.

Milgrams Experiments and the Perils of Obedience

Milgrams Experiments and the Perils of Obedience What would your reaction be if an authority figure ordered you to do something that was morally or legally wrong? Would you go through with it? For instance, if a policeman asked you to do something that was akin to covering up a crime, would you do it? Many of us might claim that they wouldn’t do it, but science has a contrary opinion.Obedience to authority is a fundamental element in the structure of society. Without some form of authority, society would most likely end up in anarchy. Since birth, we are taught that we should obey authority, and threatened with punishment should we disobey. Many childhood stories and parental lessons constantly emphasize on this.Our experiences since childhood also reaffirm the importance of obedience. For instance, a parent might ask a child not to touch a hot cooking pot. The child disobeys the parent and touches the pot, only to end up burning his finger.Through such experiences, the child learns that obeying his parents is paramount for his s afety and wellbeing.As we grow older, we learn to trust and obey people in positions of authority even more. In school, we are taught to obey our teachers since we believe they know what is good and bad for us. The same happens once we get to work, where we have to obey our bosses and others in positions of power. The same happens in other areas of life.We learn to trust and obey doctors because they are more knowledgeable than us in matters health. We trust and obey our lawyers in legal matters because they are an authority in that particular field.Sometimes, our inclination to obey authority can lead us to commit actions that might be essentially wrong, provided we are submitting to authority when doing so.A good example of such a situation is the story of Abraham from the Bible. Abraham was ready to kill his only son and offer him as a burnt sacrifice simply because God had asked him to do it. What would you if you were in the same position? Would you do it? Is this something tha t can actually happen in real life?To answer this question, let us take a look at Milgram’s experiments. MILGRAM’S SHOCKING EXPERIMENTSThe experiments conducted by Stanley Milgram from 1961 have become some of the most famous studies in the field of psychology and obedience. The experiments began shortly after the start of the trial of Adolf Eichmann, A German Nazi war criminal.During the trial, Eichmann’s defense was that he was not responsible for the millions of deaths during the holocaust. Eichmann argued that he was only guilty of having been obedient. Eichmann’s defense caught the interest of Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University who was also a Jew and whose family had been affected by the Holocaust.Influenced by Eichmann’s argument, Milgram decided to conduct an experiment focusing on the conflict between personal conscience and obedience to authority. The experiments’ results led to a major finding in psychology: very often, a man’s actions are not defined by the kind of person he is, but rather by the situation in which he finds himself.The aim of Milgram’s experiment was to find out how far people would go in obeying instructions from a seemingly authoritative person if the instructions involved causing bodily harm to another person.For the experiment, Milgram recruited random volunteers by placing calls for volunteers in newspaper ads and paid them $4.50 for their participation in the experiment. Each session of the experiment involved three parties: the experimenter, the teacher and the learner.The experiment was disguised as a study on the effect of punishment and learning. The teacher was the volunteer, who was led to believe that he would be assisting the experimenter to conduct the experiment. In real sense, the teacher was the subject of the experiment. The learner, on the other hand, was an actor and a confederate of the experimenter. However, the learner also pretended to be a volunteer.Before the start of the ex periment, the teacher and the learner arrived together and were introduced to each other. It was clarified to both of them that they would both earn the $4.50 regardless of the outcome of the experiment.To keep up the appearance that both were volunteers, they drew slips to determine who would play the role of the teacher or learner.Unbeknownst to the teacher (subject), both slips read “teacher”. The actor would then claim to have picked the “learner” slip, which meant that the subject would always play the role of the teacher. Once the roles were picked, both the teacher and the learner were guided to a room where the learner was strapped to what seemed to be an electric chair, complete with electrodes.Before starting the experiment, a sample electric shock was administered to the teacher to give him an idea of what the learner would be supposedly going through during the experiment. The teacher was then taken to an adjacent room which had an intimidating shock generator th at the teacher would use to administer punishment (electric shocks) to the learner.The shock generator was equipped with switches denoting the amount of electric shock the learner would be receiving, with each switch being 15 volts higher than the previous one. The highest level of electric shock was the 450 volts switch.Next to the switches were labels indicating the intensity of the electric shock, starting from ‘slight shock’ to “Danger: severe shock”. The last two switches with the highest level of electric shock were marked with an ambiguous “XXX”.Once the experiment got underway, the teacher was presented with a list of word pairs that he was supposed to teach the learner. The teacher first read the list of words with their corresponding words to the learner, and then moved on to simply reading a word and presenting four possible corresponding words.The learner gave his answer by pressing a button. For every wrong answer, the teacher was required to deliver shocks to the learner, with 15 volt increments after every wrong answer. The learners answers were mostly wrong (this was done on purpose), and the teacher delivered an increasing electric shock for each wrong answer.Unknown to the teacher, the shock generator was not sending out any actual shocks. Instead, the learner only pretended to be receiving the shocks.As the experiment progressed and the voltage of the ‘electric shocks’ increased, the learner started making audible pleas to be released from the electric chair. At some point, the learner even complained that he had a heart condition that would be aggravated by the severity of the electric shocks.As the electric shocks reached the 300 volt mark, the learner started banging repeatedly on the wall begging for the experiment to stop. As the shocks moved towards the highest voltage, the learner simply went silent, refusing to answer any more questions. At this point, the teacher was asked to take the silence for a wrong answer and i ncrease the intensity of the shock.At some point, most participants (teachers) grew worried about the learner and grew hesitant about delivering the shocks. Whenever the subjects grew hesitant, the experimenter would urge them to go on with a series of the following commands:“Please continue.”“The experiment requires that you continue.”“It is absolutely essential that you continue.”“You have no other choice; you must go on.”The commands were used progressively every time the teacher voiced their objection about going on with the experiment.What would you do if you were the teacher?Would you go on to administer shock levels that were marked as extremely dangerous, even when the learner had complained of having a bad heart?HOW FAR CAN PEOPLE GO IN OBEDIENCE TO AUTHORITY?For Milgram, the measure of obedience was determined by the highest level of shock the subjects were willing to administer on the learners. Would the subjects deliver the maximum 450 volts of electric s hock?Before starting the experiment, this question was posed to a group of students from Yale University. The students predicted that only 3% or less of the participants would go ahead to deliver the maximum 450 volts.The students believed only a psychopath would deliver the maximum level of shock. Milgram’s colleagues also believed that only a few subjects would go past the “very strong” level of shock.Milgram also posed the question to 40 psychiatrists, and they all agreed that most subjects would stop the experiment once the learner started demanding to be freed. The results, however, were very different.All the 40 subjects who participated in the study obeyed the instructions of the experimenter and delivered the electric shocks up to 300 volts. 26 of the 40 participants went ahead to deliver the maximum 450 volts. That is a whopping 65% of the participants, compared to the 3% that was predicted before the experiment.Many of the subjects displayed signs of tension during t he experiment, which shows that delivering the shocks went against their personal conscience. Still, they obeyed the experimenter’s instructions all the way to the end.CONCLUSIONS FROM MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENTFollowing his experiments, Milgram came to the conclusion that in doing their jobs, ordinary people who do not have any malicious intent can become part of a terrible, destructive process.Milgram also noted that, even when it was patently clear that what they were doing led to destructive results, and that their actions went against the fundamental standards of morality, only a few people have what it takes to resist authority.According to Milgram, the subjects went ahead to perform the seemingly sadistic act, not because of their personalities, but because of the situation in which they found themselves. Milgram claimed that their high levels of obedience could have been brought about by factors such as:An authority figure (the experimenter) was physically present during the e xperiment. In some variations of the experiment, the experimenter left the room and left an ordinary member of the public (a confederate in ordinary clothing) in charge of the experiment. When the experimenter was not physically present in the room, the compliance levels dropped to 20%.The fact that the study was sponsored by and conducted at Yale University (an authoritative and trusted academic institution). In variations where the experiment was conducted in a set of run down offices rather than the university, compliance levels dropped to 47.5%.The subjects assumed that the experimenter was an expert.The experimenter assured the subjects that he would take responsibility in case anything happened to the learner during the experiment.The subjects were reassured that the shocks were only painful, but not dangerous to the health or wellbeing of the learner.Milgram’s experiments have received a lot of criticism due to the ethical nature  of his experiments, mostly due to the use of deception in the experiment and the use of human subjects. However, the experiments and their findings have become a psychology classic, showing the dangers of obedience.The experiment demonstrated that situational factors have a stronger influence on obedience than personality. Milgram’s experiments have been replicated severally with consistent results.In 2009, Santa Clara University professor Jerry M. Burger replicated Milgram’s experiments and found out that people would still go ahead and deliver what they believed to be painful electric shocks to a stranger when urged by an authoritative figure.In Burger’s experiment, the obedience levels were only slightly lower than those in Milgram’s original experiment from nearly 50 years earlier. A similar experiment was replicated in Poland with similarly shocking results. Authority is also listed as one of Robert Cialdini’s 6 principles of influence, alongside other principles like reciprocity, scarcity, liking, consistenc y and social proof.Perhaps the most shocking display of how far people can go in obedience to authority was a series of real life scam phone calls that have come to be known as the McDonald’s strip search hoax.Starting in 1992 and extending over a period of 12 years, a series of incidents were reported where a man claiming to be a police office would call rural restaurants and grocery stores and convince the managers that a female employee was suspected of theft.The “police officer” would then ask the managers to conduct a strip search on the employee and have the employee perform other bizarre acts. The managers believed they were acting on behalf of the police.The most famous of these incidents happened in a McDonald’s in Mount Washington, Kentucky. The caller asked the manager to perform a strip search on a female employee and even had a male employee brought into the room.Following the instructions of the caller, the manager even brought her fiancé to her office where t he female employee was being strip searched and had the fiancé assault the female employee sexually.While the man behind the calls was eventually apprehended and tried, the incidents show how people can go willing to perform acts that go against their better judgment in obedience to authority.HOW AUTHORITY IS USED TO PERSUADE IN DAILY LIFEYou might not be asked to administer electric shocks to an innocent stranger, and mysterious callers are not going to call you claiming to be police officers asking you to conduct strip searchers of your employees, but authority can still be used to persuade you to do things you might not ordinarily do or things that go against your better judgment.For instance, con artists rely on the principle of authority to swindle or defraud you. Most con artists are talented actors. The con artist pretends to be an authority on a certain subject, and because you are psychologically predisposed to trust and obey authority, you go along with their scams withou t questioning, only to later realize they have stolen from you.In the same way, marketers convince you to purchase their products and services by using the authority principle. They claim to be the leading authority in their fields or even hire actors to play as lawyers and doctors advising you to go for their products.One thing you need to realize about obedience to authority is that people are inclined to obey authority even when the authority is not real. For instance, in Milgram’s experiment, Milgram himself was not in the room during the experiment.Instead, he hired an actor to pretend to be the experimenter. By simply pretending to be an expert and donning a white lab coat, the actor was able to convince the subjects in the experiment that he was an authority figure, and majority of the subjects went along with the actor’s wishes.Therefore, before complying with instructions or requests by an authority figure, it is good to take a minute to ask yourself whether the person authority is genuine.According to Robert Cialdini, there are three symbols that people use to signify authority and therefore get you to comply with their wishes in the absence of genuine authority. The three symbols are:Titles: Regardless of the nature of titles, or whether they are authentic or not, titles make a person appear more competent and more authoritative. Therefore, when you notice a person throwing around titles such as Dr. CEO, Chairman, Prof, Founder, PhD, and so on when they want you to do something, you should treat it as red flag. They might be trying to play on the authority principle to get you to comply with them.Clothes: Clothes are also commonly used to signify authority. Many authoritative positions are usually associated with a certain kind of clothing â€" uniforms for police officers and fire fighters, religious outfits for religious leaders, executive suits for business executives, and so on. People can trigger your inclination to obey their requests by si mply donning clothes that imply authority, even the people themselves are not in a position of authority.For instance, in Milgram’s experiment, the experimenter (actor) signified authority by simply donning a white lab coat. Another research by Bickman (1974), also found that people were more likely to obey an actor dressed in a guard’s uniform than the same actor dressed as a milkman or in civilian clothing.Trappings: Authority can also be signified by the material goods and luxuries that are associated with positions of authority. Things such as nice cars, expensive suits, mansions, jewelry, and so on are associated with positions of power, and people might use them in order to signify authority, even when the authority is not authentic.HOW TO RESIST UNWANTED PRESSURE FROM AUTHORITYWe have seen that authority can be used to pressure us to do things that go against our personal conscience or better judgment, even when the authority is not genuine. Is it possible to resist these pressures?Fortunately, there are some actions you can take when you feel you are being pressured by authority to do something you do not want to. These include:Question the authority’s legitimacy: We have already seen above that people can imply authority using titles, clothes and trappings of authority, even when their authority is not genuine. If someone tries to use any of these symbols of authority to get you to do something, you should first find out whether their legitimacy is legitimate. For instance, if someone claiming to be an expert in something gives you some advice that does not make sense, don’t follow the advice blindly. Instead, do some research on your own and ascertain the legitimacy of what they are saying.Consider your own conscience: When someone asks you to do something, ask yourself if it is something you would do out of your own initiative. If not, it might be wise to stay away from whatever you are being asked to do.Don’t comply with instructions that make you feel uneasy, even when they appear to be minor: In Milgram’s experiment, the subjects started by delivering harmless amounts of electric shock, before moving on to levels that were dangerous for the subject. Similarly, in the McDonald’s strip search hoax, victims started by being asked to do something small, such as checking the suspect’s pockets, before it gradually escalated. Giving in to the smaller requests makes it easier for you to perform the huge and distractive acts. It can be hard to pull yourself from the authority’s grip, since doing so would mean that the initial actions you took were also wrong, thus creating cognitive dissonance.Look for support: If you are asked to perform actions that you feel are against fundamental standards of morality in a group, find someone who shares your concerns. It is easier to resist authority when there is more of you compared to when you’re dissenting alone. In one variation of Milgram’s experiments, the subject wa s placed into a three person teaching team where two of the teachers (confederates of the experimenter) refused to deliver shocks past a certain point. In this variation of the experiment, only 10% of the subjects went ahead to deliver the maximum shock.WRAPPING UPWhile obedience is a good thing and helps maintain order within society, blind obedience to authority can be catastrophic.The findings of Milgram’s experiments show that ordinary people with no malicious intent can become agents in a destructive process, not because of their personality, but because of the situation they find themselves in, and because authority has a stronger influence on obedience than personal conscience.With this in mind, it is important to be aware of how authority can be used to influence us and how to protect ourselves from the pressures of authority.The key takeaway is that, wherever you find yourself doing something because of the pressure from authority, you should take a step back and ask your self whether this is something you would actually do out of your own volition.

Comparing League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, Mary Reilly,...

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, Mary Reilly, and Dr.Jekyll and Mr.Hyde Robert Louis Stevensons short novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde has spawned many retellings of Dr. Jekylls tale, as well as variations on the theme. The Jekyll and Hyde conceit is one that lends itself to many different forms of literature, such as motion pictures and sequential art. Sometimes liberties are taken in reinterpretations of Mr. Hyde from the original text. This can be distinguished in two recent works, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, a comic book miniseries by Alan Moore and Kevin ONeill, and Mary Reilly, a film by Stephen Frears. The appearance†¦show more content†¦In fact, as the movie progresses, Jekyll becomes hairier, due to his going about unshaven, but Hyde remains smooth-faced; and he has smooth, well manicured hands, a contradiction to the original book. The only character that looks like a stereotypical Hyde in the movie is Marys father, which goes to one of the themes the movie has; that of women in abusive relationships due to childhood experiences. The stature of Jekyll and Hyde in Stevensons original tale were two different things. Hyde was a dwarfish man, as described by Utterson (41) and other people. This was highlighted on several occasions where Hyde was wearing Jekylls clothing. Lanyon described Hyde as wearing clothes... [that] were enormously too large for him in every measurement (72), and when Hyde is found dead in Dr. Jekylls cabinet, [h]e was dressed in clothes far too large for him, clothes of the doctors bigness (66). Mary Reilly maintained this size disparity in some fashion. Since the parts of Jekyll and Hyde were both portrayed byShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesEthical Choice Can You Learn from Failure? 24 glOBalization! Does National Culture Affect Organizational Practices? 30 Point/Counterpoint Lost in Translation? 31 Questions for Review 32 Experiential Exercise Workforce Diversity 32 Ethical Dilemma Jekyll and Hyde 33 Case Incident 1 â€Å"Lessons for ‘Undercover’ Bosses† 34 Case Incident 2 Era of the Disposable Worker? 35 vii viii CONTENTS 2 2 The Individual Diversity in Organizations 39 Diversity 40 Demographic Characteristics of the

Emily Dickinson Transcendentalist Experience Through...

Emily Dickinson: Transcendentalist Experience Through Imagination The early 19th century ideas of transcendentalism, which were introduced by Ralph Emerson and David Thoreau, where man as an individual becomes spiritually consumed with nature and himself through experience are contrasted by Emily Dickinson, who chose to branch off this path by showing that a transcendentalist experience could be achieved through imagination alone. These three monumental writers set the boundaries for this new realm of thought. Although these writers ideas were not similar, they all followed the simple idea that the universe is composed of Nature and the Soul . The male perspective seen through the works of Thoreau and Emerson, where nature refers†¦show more content†¦Emerson felt that man, corrupted by society, can over power the fate of over looking his true meaning. Escaping from the wheel of society into the woods, is perpetual youth. By living in the woods, he found that fusing nature with soul, one can accomplish anything. Emerson felt that nature was an extension of five of his senses, where he could feel the tree moving in the wind as if it was his own body. He stressed the theme of having intercourse with heaven and earth, or interlacing your body and soul with nature. But, of all five senses, he stressed vision the most. Beauty can only be accomplished through the gate way of the eye, which is where most experiences are derived from. The eye is the best of artists , and has the power to display the simple perception of natural forms , which is where true beauty comes form. Nature satisfies the soul purely by its loveliness . By becoming a transparent eye-ball. I am nothing. I see all . Being self reliant on oneself, following the idea that Man is his own star , Emerson displays his transcendentalist idea that applies to anyone who would like to follow it. The importance of flowing with nature, and excepting what you are is stressed in Emersons self-reliance. By following the modo Ne te quà ¦siveris extra , Emerson completely committed himself toShow MoreRelatedEmily Dickinson And Walt Whitman1719 Words   |  7 Pagesthey want to say to their readers. A lot of time what and how an author writes comes from how they grew up and the experiences they have had. They find a way to insert themselves and their emotions into words that move the readers in some way. One of the most popular periods of writing would be the romanticism era. Some of the most well known authors in this time period were Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman. The reason they are so popular from the Romanticism period is because they also incorporatedRead MoreHow Fa Has the Use of English Language En riched or Disrupted Life and Culture in Mauritius15928 Words   |  64 Pagesposts here. Share this: †¢ Twitter †¢ Facebook †¢ Like this: Like Loading... [pic] 26 Comments on â€Å"CLOSE READINGS† 1. [pic]John Cooper says: July 13, 2011 at 3:36 pm Emily Dickenson’s poem â€Å"Because I could not stop for Death† details the events the narrator experiences after dying. In the poem, the narrator is driven around in a horse-drawn carriage to several places, including a schoolyard, a field of wheat, and a house sunken in the ground. However, a deeper readingRead MoreEssay on Women Authors of the 19th Century3166 Words   |  13 Pagesthe 19th century. These women expressed their inner most thoughts and ideas through their writings. They helped to change society, perhaps without knowing it, through poetry, novels, and articles. Emily Dickinson, Harriet Jacobs, Kate Chopin, Louisa May Alcott, and Elizabeth Oakes Smith are the best-known controversial and expressive women authors of their time. On December 10, 1830 a poet was born. When Emily Dickinson was born in Amherst, Massachusetts, no one knew that she was to become the mostRead MoreBrief Survey of American Literature3339 Words   |  14 Pagesemotion, natural beauty - imagination, mysticism, liberalism (freedom to express personal feelings) Romantic vs. Neoclassic (2) Innovation: - subjects: common life; the supernatural; the far away and the long ago - style: common language really used by men; poetic symbolism Romantic vs. Neoclassic(3) Good poetry is â€Å"the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings.† - unforced and free composition out of the inherent organic â€Å"laws† of the poet’s imagination Romantic vs. Neoclassic(4)

Genetic Testing Controversies Free Essays

Genetic Testing Controversies 1-12-11 Biology Genetic Testing, also known as DNA-based tests, is a new method of testing for genetic diseases or disorders. In the test the DNA molecule is examined and other tests include microscopic examination of chromosomes, for stained or fluorescent chromosomes. Genetic tests are used for carrier screening, newborn screening, identity testing, prenatal diagnostic testing, and prediction of disorders later in life such as Huntington’s or Alzheimer’s disease etc. We will write a custom essay sample on Genetic Testing Controversies or any similar topic only for you Order Now Human Genome Project) Controversies today that genetic testing today faces is with the privacy, consents, equity and discrimination. The privacy of the information that is found may not be confidential between the patient and the doctor it may also be revealed to other people that are not involved in the issue. The controversies with consent are that should the insurance companies be allowed to have the information of medical records and family histories before granting permission to anything. (Friesen, Tim. The Genetic Testing Controversy). The costs of some of these genetic tests are very expensive, some costing more than $1000. Another controversy is related with discrimination to the people shown by insurance companies, where they are discriminating on the people by the information which is received to them by genetic tests. Another example is where a woman who had applied to become an adoptive parent was denied due to a family history of Huntington’s disease which also made her susceptible to the disease. Friesen, Tim. The Genetic Testing Controversy) An advantage of Genetic testing is that it gives information about any disease or disorders a person may have and treat that person immediately for a cure. Another advantage is that these tests help to live a risk free life from the beginning, for example- Genetic testing are done on new born babies, which helps to identify any disorders from the beginning so treatment can be given immediately. Benefits of genetic testing) Anoth er advantage of genetic testing is that there are fewer checkups and visits to the doctor if there is a history of a disease in a family. Another advantage is that if a person is genetically tested and the results are positive, they get to make â€Å"informed decisions† in their life. (Benefits of Gene Testing. National Cancer Institute) A disadvantage of genetic testing is that if a person is positive for a disease which cannot be cured completely, is still in a risk. Related essay: â€Å"Advantages and Disadvantages of Genetic Engineering† For example breast and ovarian cancers, you cannot get rid of each and every breast or ovary related cells. Even after the surgery, the risk is still there. Another disadvantage is many people after receiving their test results and testing positive for a disease, leads to depression, anxiety or anger for most people, mostly women in these cases. Another disadvantage of genetic testing is many people face discrimination in getting insurance, or employment due to the results of that person’s genetic test. Citation Pictures http://www. beltina. org/pics/genetic_testing. jpg How to cite Genetic Testing Controversies, Essay examples

Mid-autumn Festival and Moon Cakes free essay sample

The Mid-Autumn Festival also known as the Moon Festival or Moon cake Festival. The festival is held on the 15th day of the 8th lunar month. When was mid-autumn festival first appeared? A description of the festival first appeared in Rites of Zhou, a written collection of rituals of the Western Zhou Dynasty from 3,000 years ago. The celebration became popular during the early Tang Dynasty. The history and origins of mid-autumn festival The Mid-Autumn Festival is a traditional festivity for both the Han and minority nationalities. The custom of worshipping the moon (called xi yue in Chinese) can be traced back as far as the ancient Xia and Shang Dynasties (2000 B. C. -1066 B. C. ). In the Zhou Dynasty(1066 B. C. -221 B. C. ), people hold ceremonies to greet winter and worship the moon whenever the Mid-Autumn Festival sets in. It becomes very prevalent in the Tang Dynasty(618-907 A. D. ) that people enjoy and worship the full moon. In the Southern Song Dynasty (1127-1279 A. D.), however, people send round moon cakes to their relatives as gifts in expression of their best wishes of family reunion. The story of mid-autumn festival Hou Yi was a tyrannical ruler who won the elixir of life by shooting 9 suns out of the sky with his bow. Even though he did this to save lots of people, but his wife Chang E knowing that the peoples lives would remain miserable for forever if Hou Yi’s life everlasting. So she drank the potion. The fluids made her lighter and lighter, and then she floated up into the moon. In memory of Chang E, people later set the date of the fifteenth day of the eighth lunar month as Mid-Autumn Festival. How do we celebrate mid-autumn festival? Eating moon cakes. Plan a family reunion dinner or barbecue on the evening of the full moon. Attend a mid-autumn festival in your community or go to an area where you will have a good view of the moon. Carrying brightly lit lanterns, lighting lanterns on towers, floating sky lanterns. Fire Dragon Dances. Admire the full moon and think of relatives who may be at a distance Why do we celebrated mid-autumn festival? It has a long history in China. This day was considered a harvest festival since fruits, vegetables and grain had been harvested by this time and food was abundant. So to appreciate the moon. And the moon also know as reunion. Moon cake Moon cakes are traditionally Chinese pastries generally eaten during the Mid-Autumn Festival. Mid-Autumn Festival is one of the two most important festivals in Chinese calendar (the other being the Chinese New Year). The festival typically involves family getting together to share moon cakes while watching the moon. Typical Chinese moon cakes are round in shape, and measure around 10 cm (4 inches) in diameter and 4-5 cm (2 inches) in thickness. Most moon cakes consist of a thin tender skin enveloping a sweet, dense filling. Moon cakes are usually eaten in small wedges shared by family members. They are generally served with Chinese tea, and very rarely, moon cakes are served steamed or fried. For generations, moon cakes have been made with sweet fillings of nuts, mashed red beans, lotus-seed paste or Chinese dates, wrapped in a pastry. Sometimes a cooked egg yolk can be found in the middle of the rich tasting dessert.